
🇩🇪 Another European Region Ditches Microsoft: Linux Adoption Accelerates
Following Denmark’s recent move to transition its digital infrastructure to Linux and LibreOffice, a German federal state has now announced a similar plan — dropping Microsoft Windows and Office in favor of open-source alternatives. The shift is gaining momentum, and it’s starting to look like a growing European movement.
But what does this trend mean for the future of government IT, digital sovereignty, and cybersecurity?
A Growing Pattern Across Europe
First Denmark, now a German state — and this might just be the beginning. In the article published by PC för Alla, the German state has declared its intention to gradually move public institutions away from Microsoft products. The reasons are similar across the board:
- Reducing dependence on foreign tech giants
- Saving public money
- Gaining control over software ecosystems
- Ensuring long-term access and compatibility through open standards
Europe has long been debating digital sovereignty, especially as tensions rise globally over data protection and geopolitical control of tech infrastructure. Open-source software offers an escape from this vendor lock-in.
The Positive Outcomes
- Economic Savings: No more massive license renewals for operating systems and productivity suites.
- Customizability: Open-source allows tailoring to local needs — something large commercial vendors rarely provide.
- Transparency: Anyone can audit the code, which is especially important for public institutions handling sensitive data.
- Standardization Across Borders: If multiple EU countries use similar open-source stacks, it could lead to better interoperability and shared resources.
But Not Without Risk
Despite its advantages, the shift comes with challenges:
- Learning Curve: Staff accustomed to Windows and Microsoft Office will need training and time to adapt.
- Compatibility: Not all workflows or legacy systems migrate smoothly — especially in bureaucracy-heavy sectors.
- Support Infrastructure: While Microsoft offers commercial support, governments must now rely on internal expertise or third-party support companies.
- Security Target Shift: As mentioned in our earlier coverage of Denmark’s move — the more popular Linux becomes, the more attractive it becomes to attackers.
“Security through obscurity” is no longer an option. If Linux-based systems become the new standard in public administration, they must be secured with the same (or higher) rigor traditionally applied to Windows-based environments.
What the Future Might Hold
If this trend continues, we could see:
- A cascade effect, with other regions and countries following suit
- The development of new government-funded open-source distributions or tools
- A more resilient, independent European digital landscape
- But also, a potential rise in Linux-targeted malware, phishing campaigns, and zero-day exploits
Governments must prepare for both the benefits and the responsibilities that come with running an open-source infrastructure.
Final Thoughts
This isn’t just about software — it’s about sovereignty, transparency, and the future of public digital services. If properly managed, the move to Linux can empower governments and protect citizen data. But poor implementation or lack of preparation could lead to service disruptions, user frustration, and even new cyberattack vectors.
Europe is changing. The question is: will the rest of the world follow?