Privilege escalation (often shortened to priv-esc) is one of the most critical steps in an attack chain. It allows an attacker to gain higher privileges after compromising a low-level account — ultimately leading to root or SYSTEM access. In this article, we’ll explore how it works, real-world examples, and how to protect your systems.
Types of Privilege Escalation
Vertical: Gaining higher-level privileges (e.g., from user to root).
Horizontal: Gaining access to another user’s data or processes at the same privilege level.
Common Linux Techniques
Sudo misconfigurations: E.g., sudo vim → :!bash for root shell.
SUID binaries: Exploiting binaries like /usr/bin/python with setuid bit.
Kernel exploits: DirtyCow (CVE-2016-5195), OverlayFS, etc.
Writable /etc/passwd: Injecting a fake root user.
Common Windows Techniques
Unquoted service paths: Abuse poor service path handling.
AlwaysInstallElevated: MSI abuse to gain SYSTEM access.
Token impersonation: Tools like Juicy Potato or PrintSpoofer.
Tools for Enumeration
Linux: LinPEAS, LES.sh, pspy, GTFOBins
Windows: WinPEAS, Seatbelt, PowerUp.ps1
Defense Strategies
Enforce the Principle of Least Privilege (PoLP).
Audit sudoers and SUID binaries regularly.
Monitor for suspicious cron jobs and startup tasks.
Apply patches early to reduce kernel and service exploits.
Use Sysmon, auditd, and log management for detection.
Final Thoughts
Privilege escalation is powerful — and dangerous. Whether you’re a penetration tester or a system administrator, understanding both attack and defense is critical for keeping systems secure. Always think like an attacker… before they do.
Exploring the Best Operating Systems for Pentesting & Security: Beyond Kali and Parrot
By Jull3Haxor | jull3.net
When it comes to penetration testing, red teaming, and security research, your choice of operating system is more than just personal preference—it shapes your daily workflow, the tools you have on hand, and even your security posture. While everyone knows about Kali Linux and Parrot OS, the landscape is much broader and more nuanced. In this article, I’ll break down popular, niche, and advanced options—plus share why I personally choose Arch with BlackArch tools for ultimate flexibility.
1. Kali Linux
What it is: The gold standard for many pentesters, Kali is based on Debian and comes preloaded with hundreds of security tools.
Pros:
Massive toolset out of the box—almost everything you need is preinstalled.
Huge community, lots of documentation and tutorials.
Available for ARM, Docker, VM, WSL, and even Android (Nethunter).
Frequent updates, maintained by Offensive Security.
Cons:
Can feel bloated if you only use a handful of tools.
Not ideal for daily-driver use (security first, convenience second).
Everyone uses it—malware often targets default Kali environments.
Best for: Fast deployment, learning, CTFs, labs, when you want “everything” ready.
2. Parrot Security OS
What it is: Debian-based, privacy-focused alternative to Kali, with additional features for forensics and anonymity.
Pros:
Lightweight compared to Kali; more privacy tools (Tor, Anonsurf, etc.).
Offers “Home” edition for regular use and “Security” edition for pentesting.
Sandbox support, secure browser options.
Active community and attractive UI (MATE by default).
Cons:
Slightly smaller tool selection than Kali, but most popular tools included.
Can be buggy after big updates.
Best for: Those who value anonymity, privacy, and want a lighter pentesting distro.
3. BlackArch
What it is: An Arch Linux-based penetration testing distribution/repo with 2,800+ tools.
Pros:
Ultra-flexible—use as a full distro or just add BlackArch repo to your existing Arch setup.
Rolling release model—always up-to-date.
Install only what you need (not a “kitchen sink” like Kali).
Hardcore minimalist design for those who like to customize.
Cons:
Steeper learning curve (it’s Arch!).
Fewer “hand-holding” scripts; expect to configure things yourself.
Not ideal for total beginners.
Best for: Advanced users who want granular control and minimal bloat.
4. Arch Linux (with BlackArch or custom tools)
What it is: Vanilla Arch Linux with just the tools you want (e.g., via BlackArch repo or manual install).
Pros:
Absolute minimalism—install only what you’ll actually use.
Samurai Web Testing Framework: Web app pentest distro.
Cyborg Hawk, Dracos Linux, Network Security Toolkit, RedHawk, Matriux: Specialized/experimental, often for CTFs, learning or specific domains.
Rolling vs. Fixed Releases
Rolling (Arch, BlackArch, Parrot, etc.): Always up-to-date, but potentially less stable. Great for latest tools and kernel features.
Fixed (Kali, Ubuntu-based, Fedora Security): More predictable, tested environments. Good for enterprise or when stability is critical.
Personal Workflow: Arch + BlackArch Tools + Proxmox
Personally, I run Arch Linux as my daily driver and pull in only the tools I actually use (from the BlackArch repo or the AUR). This gives me a lean, blazing-fast system—no bloat, just exactly what I need. If I ever require the “full Kali/Parrot experience” (for example, when tackling a CTF box or running a full red team engagement), I simply SSH into my Proxmox server and spin up a dedicated VM with Kali or Parrot. This setup lets me sandbox my activities, test exploits safely, and avoid polluting my main environment with tools or configs I rarely touch.
Why this workflow rocks:
Ultimate flexibility: My host system stays clean, minimal, and stable.
On-demand power: I get access to the full toolset when needed—without having to dual boot or clutter my laptop.
Safe testing: Anything risky stays isolated on its own VM, snapshot-ready.
Resource efficiency: My main system isn’t running hundreds of pentest tools I’ll never use.
Choosing the Right Distro: What Matters Most
Experience level: New to pentesting? Kali or Parrot gets you started quick. Power user? Build your own from Arch or Gentoo.
Preferred tools and workflow: Do you want everything out-of-the-box, or do you prefer building your own toolkit?
Stability vs. bleeding edge: Need latest exploits or rock-solid reliability?
Hardware support: Some distros (Qubes, Pentoo) are pickier about hardware.
Anonymity/forensics needs: Some are better for red teaming, others for forensics, blue teaming, or OSINT.
Summary Table
Distro
Base
Use Case
Pros
Cons
Kali Linux
Debian
Pentest, CTF
Huge toolset, docs
Bloated, targeted, not daily
Parrot Security
Debian
Privacy, Pentest
Lighter, privacy tools
Fewer tools, bugs
BlackArch
Arch
Custom, Power user
Modular, latest tools
Arch learning curve
Arch + BlackArch
Arch
Custom daily driver
Minimal, blazing fast
Setup/time investment
BackBox
Ubuntu
Lightweight pentest
XFCE, familiar, stable
Smaller, less active
Pentoo
Gentoo
Advanced, live use
Hardened, optimized
Gentoo curve, fewer tools
Fedora Sec Spin
Fedora
RedHat ecosystem
Secure, modern
Fewer tools, small community
CAINE, REMnux, etc.
Varies
Forensics/Malware
Specialized
Niche only
Qubes OS
Fedora
Isolation, research
Compartmentalization
Resource heavy, tricky HW
Windows + WSL
Windows
Hybrid workflow
Win+Linux together
Not pure, limited tools
Final Thoughts
There’s no “one size fits all” in the world of pentesting OSes. Kali is not the only way—and for many, it’s not even the best. Try a few, experiment with minimalism, and don’t be afraid to build a workflow that fits your needs, not the marketing hype.
What’s your favorite setup? Want to know more about BlackArch, Proxmox labs, or building your own security toolkit? Drop a comment or connect at jull3.net or Facebook!